Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maritime Executive
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 17:53, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Maritime Executive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A non-notable trade publication that fails WP:GNG. All the sourcing in the article is to the publication's own pages, but a WP:BEFORE search shows no qualifying independent WP:SIGCOV of the publication. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Business, and Florida. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTFB. Bearian (talk) 02:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.