Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcia Weekes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marcia Weekes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiography of a seemingly unnotable person. No sources, and pretty sure good sources don't exist. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I wish I could !vote keep on this one, because cinema of smaller nations is sorely under-represented at Wikipedia, but I can't find any verifiable facts about Weekes to back up this article. It claims that her Hush film series is "award winning" (and that phrase is used all over the web to describe the series) but the actual awards won are never specified, and I can't find any facts to back up that claim. The claim that Weekes was nominated for the 2006 Bronze Lens Film Festival is clearly wrong, as that film festival was not founded until 2009 (see [1]), and a search of their site for the name "Marcia Weekes" comes up empty. The claims of founding various dance companies are also unverifiable. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:56, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Barbados-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Could have been prodded as unsourced BLP anyway, since IMDB isn't an independent RS source Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Jimfbleak not notable and lacks reliable sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:41, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.