Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malcolm bonney
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Malcolm bonney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Not sure if this person meets WP:BIO. No outside links or references. KJS77 22:05, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no sources or real information, doesn't really give much context, and judging by the creator being called Mbonney, may be an article about themselves--Jac16888 22:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I would have considered speedy on this. To say someone did some paintings and nothing more isn't enough of an assertion. He might be notable, but the article has to give some indication of it. DGG 23:59, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - likely vanity; subject totally non notable. Bigdaddy1981 02:52, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 16:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE! Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a web blog or a message board for bands. 24.218.172.197 17:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT, WP:N, WP:SOAP. Unverifiable, messy, rambling, soapbox of an autobiography. Bearian 18:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.