Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madhukar Soma
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:08, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Madhukar Soma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
resume-like article with a forest of refs, but mostly to his own website. I see nothing which comes anywhere close to being relevant to WP:GNG. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:08, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:52, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:52, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:52, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete The sources cited are not independent and a quick Google search yields close to nothing in terms of WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources. Probably WP:COI. JTtheOG (talk) 23:56, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE due to a lack of independent coverage, and fails to posit how this photographer is individually notable enough for inclusion in an encyclopedia.--SamHolt6 (talk) 15:29, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.