Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M2001

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

M2001

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG, no SIGCOV outside the original paper Helpful Raccoon (talk) 21:07, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 21:07, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The original paper from 1998 (a "technical notice" in a special-interest-group newsletter) has no citations in Google Scholar. This appears to have had no traction and we have no coverage at all (let alone SIGCOV) in sources independent from its author. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Mathematics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article fails WP:GNG, I could find no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. - Aoidh (talk) 03:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This article relies solely on a 1998 paper that doesn't have any citations or independent coverage. It looks like the only source is the original paper itself, which clearly isn't enough. Waqar💬 15:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.