Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lowell Greenough - Artist and Anti War Activist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:58, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lowell Greenough - Artist and Anti War Activist

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Artist. Article created by a gallery which has a close connection to the subject. Has a couple of hits by other galleries which are also have a relationship to the subject as they are selling his work, but nothing as far as I can see in terms of reliable third-party coverage. Travelbird (talk) 09:27, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lacking reliable sources to establish notability of an individual. No gnews matches, even google web searches are paltry. tedder (talk) 15:10, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:09, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:12, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:ARTIST, and WP:MILPEOPLE. No proof of notability, massive NPOV and COI issues, the only three RSs only prove he was a conscientious objector and some of his art was exhibited in LA, and the article as it stands is a mess. bahamut0013^words _deeds 20:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all. Some near-(self?)copyvio too. Johnbod (talk) 13:52, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.