Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Cowie
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to STV_News_at_Six#North_region. (non-admin closure) v/r - TP 00:05, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Louise Cowie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is about a television news report that lacks any referencing. I've searched and been able to find any coverage about her that would establish notability. Whpq (talk) 18:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. — Baseball Watcher 19:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to STV News at Six#North region. All the noteworthy things about her are already written in the STV News article. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 11:44, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect I'm unable to find enough in the way of references to establish notability under the GNG, although [1] at least verifies a journalist by that name. --joe deckertalk to me 15:53, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect Further research reveals no more sources other than [2]. Notability is not asserted. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:48, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect I was also unable to find any third-party coverage other than the brief mention cited above. Hut 8.5 08:50, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Joe Decker. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 00:22, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.