Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Witch Series (Kogado Studio)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 20:05, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Little Witch Series (Kogado Studio)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All articles related to this game series have been deleted before (see this past deletion discussion) with little to no controversy, and the editor responsible for writing them (Patriciatajiya) has now rewritten some of them, without addressing any of the problems listed in the original AfD discussion. As these same justifications for deletion remain, I suggest prompt removal of them all, as the editor, being the same person, has had ample time to address these concerns. For example, notability has still not been established whatsoever, and there are virtually no citations orexternal links except for the games' own official web pages. G-Flex (talk) 03:46, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The associated articles I am also nominating, for the reasons above and in the original AfD mentioned, are those also linked in this article:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. G-Flex (talk) 04:02, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. I can't find (at least English and I'm unable to interpret Japanese) multiple reliable secondary independent sources with significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG for any of the four games to establish notability. Consequently, the series topic is also not notable. I'm hoping someone speaking Japanese can search Japanese sources. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 15:21, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 04:44, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Notability not shown. Thank you. Also, author appears to be doing public relations for several places without revealing his or her relationship. GeorgeLouis (talk) 04:46, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless there are more reliable sources. —Ed!^(talk) 08:54, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - All unsourced, couldn't find sources. Not much is lost with deletion anyways, much of the articles are just lists of characters/voice actors anyways. Sergecross73 msg me 15:12, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.