Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dungeons & Dragons nonhuman deities

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:56, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Dungeons & Dragons nonhuman deities (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list fails to establish notability for itself. There already exists List of Dungeons & Dragons deities, which contains what could be considered the important characters from this list. All of the sub-lists of this article have been removed or will soon be removed via AfD. If there is a need for a list of deities at all, then "List of Dungeons & Dragons deities" is completely sufficient to cover the important ones. Those too minor can just be left out. This list is not justified as a spinout. TTN (talk) 12:54, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 12:54, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 12:54, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:56, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This list is essentially just a massive combination of a bunch of other lists that have either already been deleted/merged or are well on their way to being so, and using only primary sources. None of the individual lists of racial deities passed WP:LISTN, and an even larger list combining all of them does not as well. Rorshacma (talk) 16:13, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.