Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 324 Arabic names
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- List of 324 Arabic names (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a single independent source has given any attention to this list of names. It hasn't been the focus of any discussion or commentary. Fails WP:N by a large margin. Fram (talk) 09:52, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Yet another example of an article attempting to pass off something merely mentioned in the Guantanamo administrative review documents as a separate encyclopedic topic. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nomination. Anotherclown (talk) 09:26, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per above. IQinn (talk) 23:35, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per nom, fails notability.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 14:51, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 20:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 20:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guantanamo Bay detainment camp-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 20:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.