Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Collins (academic)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:14, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lisa Collins (academic) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP with no independent references. Not obviously notable Rathfelder (talk) 20:14, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 20:14, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:20, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 22:52, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Dean of a residential house is way too low an academic administration position for notability, and her name is so common that I can't find anything else of interest about her. I'd be willing to change my mind if someone can convincingly demonstrate that she has or had an ongoing and successful academic career that passes WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR, but for now there's just too little to go on. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:20, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I couldn't find anything to base a notability claim upon or write an article with. If anyone else has better luck, I'll happily revisit my opinion. XOR'easter (talk) 01:34, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The best source cited here is the subject's own LinkedIn page, which is not saying much. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:37, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per everyone else. StAnselm (talk) 05:14, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Zero significant sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:23, 22 May 2019 (UTC).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.