Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lim May Zhee (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:29, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lim May Zhee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded by an IP, in an apparent case of WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. IP's rationale: Would really like to request that this page deleted, per Wikipedia's policy as such: "Discussions concerning biographical articles of relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion and there is no rough consensus, may be closed as delete. Poorly sourced biographical articles of unknown, non-public figures, where the discussions have no editor opposing the deletion, may be deleted after discussions have been completed. If a deletion discussion of any biographical article (of whether a well known or less known individual) has received few or no comments from any editor besides the nominator, the discussion may be closed at the closer's discretion and best judgment." Please for the love of God can we just remove this entry of Wikipedia or at least fix it to be accurate in which case the only factual thing about it is that this individual lives in Brooklyn, New York...which does not make it very notable for Wikipedia. – Train2104 (t • c) 18:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SophisticatedSwampert ^{let's talk about that} 19:17, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. SophisticatedSwampert ^{let's talk about that} 19:17, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. SophisticatedSwampert ^{let's talk about that} 19:17, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:25, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Based on the text of the article, I think the subject would not meet our notability requirements. In addition, all four references are dead links (and external links provided in the previous AFD are dead links), so the entire content of the article is unverifiable. Combined with the apparent deletion request from the subject of the article, it should be deleted. Deli nk (talk) 12:04, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per request.--Rpclod (talk) 12:36, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.