Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lifeaid
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:28, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Lifeaid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An article on an energy drink company founded in 2011, sourced to routine coverage, fastest-growing lists and funding announcements. Aside from the sources in the article, there is this BevNet article, but neither that nor the Santa Cruz Sentinel piece seem sufficient to meet WP:CORPDEPTH and demonstrate this to be more than a routine company going about its business. AllyD (talk) 10:30, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:33, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:33, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Not enough coverage to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON, but the company has been around for over 5 years. Onel5969 TT me 15:22, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.