Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lavinia Spalding (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 20:20, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lavinia Spalding

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks notability. As is often the case with authors, there is nothing about this specific subject that denotes notability worthy of WP inclusion. The only aspect that would roughly qualify would being part of a larger collection that was nominated (but didn't win) an award. As such, the collection may be notable, but the author not. Article has and continues to be an orphan thus inferring a lack of relevance. Article was originally created by an anonymous user who only created other articles relating to this author thus inferring a conflict of interest. Lastly, article is completely devoid of any references to support the text. Primecoordinator (talk) 17:24, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't find any coverage about the subject, only articles written by her on her website or in a couple of magazines — Frankie (talk) 17:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.