Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurie Smith (pornographic actress)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 01:28, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Laurie Smith (pornographic actress) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage and doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 00:18, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nominated for an award she didn't win, and lacks non-trivial coverage otherwise. JBsupreme (talk) 06:38, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:57, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this pornographic actress. Joe Chill (talk) 01:59, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Obscure actress. Also no pictures and the internet motto is "if there aren't pictures, it didn't happen —Preceding unsigned comment added by John Obamo (talk • contribs) 06:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.