Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lathander (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:41, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lathander

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence this fictional character passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Coverage limited to mentions in WP:PRIMARY sources (books, games, etc.). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, appears to be pure fancruft with no notability._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 11:26, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. All the sources currently in the article, as well as all the sources given in the previous AfD, are either primary or self-published. A quick web search also shows only primary or self-published sources. Because of this, it's quite obvious that the topic of the page doesn't meet WP:GNG, since it has received no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. At it's current state, the page is also a giant WP:JUSTPLOT violation, as besides the "Publication history" section, it contains no real-world context. Not a very active user (talk) 10:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.