Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Know Pratibha Patil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Indian presidential election, 2007. Dreadstar † 18:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Know Pratibha Patil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
"Know Pratibha Patil" was essentially just an attack site used by the opposition against the ruling party's candidate in the Indian presidential election last year. No particular evidence of notability has been shown (the site itself is already dead), and while a sentence stating that the site existed wouldn't hurt in the article devoted to the election, this page is overkill. Biruitorul (talk) 01:40, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete if its an attackNewAtThis (talk) 02:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- User is a banned sock. Jfire (talk) 01:08, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep es. It helps to read the article. This page is not an attack page, but a page about an external political site used for controversial purposes. Weak keep only because I am not convinced fully that it has separate notability. Whether or not the site is currently dead would not be relevant if it did have political importance while it was up.DGG (talk) 06:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, perhaps my phrasing was unclear - I meant the site itself, not our page about the site, was an attack site. As for its being down not being relevant: well, I admit we don't know why it was taken down; it may be its creators didn't think it important enough to keep up, though this is veering into speculation. Biruitorul (talk) 15:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Indian presidential election, 2007, topic notable and material valuable, but would function better as parts of the overall article on the election itself. --Soman (talk) 11:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.