Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalid Altowelli
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:47, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Khalid Altowelli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This has been a minimally-referenced BLP for some months, basically a CV tended by IPs without the level of referencing or evidence of Notability improving. I flagged it for WP:PROD today on the rationale "No reliable 3rd party evidence that this person is more than a man with a job; article is sourced to articles by the subject and firms for which he has worked. Fails WP:JOURNALIST." The Prod was removed by IP without comment. I am bringing this to AfD now on the same rationale as the earlier Prod. AllyD (talk) 08:41, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:47, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:47, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• contribs • logs) 02:20, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 10:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as it seems to be self-promotion. Nothing on the page makes the subject notable and, as mentioned above, sources are written by himself. The inclusion of an "influenced by" category (with Noam Chomsky's name misspelled) seems to indicate he wrote this himself. In any case, I think there is a general agreement that Wikipedia is not an online CV Gmkeros (talk) 11:08, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 11:01, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 01:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.