Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ketzal's Corridors
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep, WP:SNOW. I guess I was wrong; withdrawn. =^_^= Non-admin closure. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 16:05, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Ketzal's Corridors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Video game that appears to have no notability. -- Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 05:08, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Easily meets notability requirements. Reviewed on IGN[1], UK Official Nintendo Magazine[2], Edge[3] (note, as the article says, the game is called SpeedThru: Potzol's Puzzle in Europe). --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:02, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per above. Notability is thin, granted, but I think the coverage I'm seeing is sufficient. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 13:12, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Notable. SL93 (talk) 23:21, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Been seeing a lot of coverage on this game. I can provide more, but I'm pretty sure Colapeninsula's are plenty. Sergecross73 msg me 01:13, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sources in the article seem enough to meet GNG. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:51, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.