Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerokan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Wizardman 20:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kerokan

Microstub, no information, no references. Creator is a banned sockpuppet. Garyseven (talk) 03:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It could use some work, but with the laziest of googling I have found minor notability and references. It has been up long enough (since 12/07) that the sock-puppet aspect is moot. JohnnyMrNinja 03:58, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - regardless of google - the practice of kerokan is a long standing practice by dukuns and other traditional health workers in Java in Indonesia - and it is a classic practice for curing afflcitcions such as a 'masuk angin' which although alien to non javanese - was and possiby still is a culturally bound syndrome - as for whether it was created by jimbo wales or a sock puppet - it is a notable cultural practice which could stand up to WP:N, WP:V and WP:RS without much trouble if the afd doesnt go through Satu Suro 14:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. —JohnnyMrNinja 04:00, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —JohnnyMrNinja 04:01, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or, less ideally, merge into Gua Sha if appropriate. Notable practice, sources for expansion shouldn't be hard to find. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 18:28, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable quack cure - one of many. Can't see what could possibly be added. Perhaps could be mentioned in Dukun or other relevant articles. Davidelit (talk) 02:25, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - prepared for merge with dukun - could be a good compromise - as to the the nature of the practice - have taken the issue up at the Indonesian Project noticeboard Satu Suro 02:43, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Gua Sha. Basically just a local name for the same practice. Barfoos (talk) 22:07, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as notable (and easily google-source-able) folk psuedomedicine. {{cleanup}} is not a rationale for deletion. Ford MF (talk) 15:30, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.