Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Bager

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kenneth Bager

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A recent spate of vandalism has helped draw attention to the fact that Bager fails WP:MUSICBIO. Laun chba ller 21:39, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of sufficient notability, the whole text being an exercise in puffery, potentially involving some conflict of interest.-The Gnome (talk) 08:07, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - article passes both WP:BIO and WP:GNG. The sources include significant coverage in major newspapers like Berlingske Tidende [1], Politiken [2] and The Guardian [3], which provides enough to pass our general notability guidelines. Any problems with POV language and style can be addressed through editing. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 01:59, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 17:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:59, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Middling Keep after fixing/removing dead links (6, 7, 8). Current information, added recently, seems to be heading toward substantiality. Note: You can push a web page to the Internet Archive at the time you cite it, and get a persistent URL for it, so link rot doesn't happen in the (near) future. Go to https://archive.org/web/ and use the "Save Now" box. LaMona (talk) 21:13, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.