Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith L. Magee
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 03:04, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keith L. Magee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable individual lacking GHITS and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO. Article created by COI. reddogsix (talk) 18:15, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. 18:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I went looking for sources to improve the article, and found enough to suggest that his museum may be notable enough for an article. But I still don't think he is. The best I could find was one local newspaper article (now cited as a source) which mentions his Harvard Divinity School education; the rest just quoted him about his museum but didn't say anything else about him. I don't think that's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser TSU 01:11, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG per lack of independent, verifiable sources. Not notable. Jimsteele9999 (talk) 20:20, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per the nomination. Also, evidence to support assetions not available.--Juristicweb (talk) 23:05, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.