Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juliane Codd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 03:08, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Juliane Codd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG, appears to be WP:PROMO. Both bands listed fail to meet the criteria in WP:MUSICBIO. Related AfDs: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Blue_and_The_Grey_Band and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cape Harmony ― Padenton |☎ 20:04, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can't find any shred of notability anywhere!, No point redirecting to the band as that's listed here too!, Both her and the band have no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 23:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per past practice to her band, The Blue and The Grey. Bearian (talk) 20:15, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Bearian: The band doesn't meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG either.― Padenton |☎ 02:27, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:51, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All I know is that sometimes we merge a bunch a stubs into one decent article, from what I recall at WP:OUTCOMES. I suggested the same here, but there is no rule that requires us to do so. I won't oppose deletion in this case. Bearian (talk) 00:03, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.