Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josiah Benedict Lidinsky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Larry V (talk | email) 23:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Josiah Benedict Lidinsky

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:PROF even if DLSU is to be considered a "major academic institution" under Criterion 6, considering that the posts he held were not the highest-level positions in the university. Moray An Par (talk) 03:10, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Moray An Par (talk) 03:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Moray An Par (talk) 03:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Moray An Par (talk) 03:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Moray An Par (talk) 03:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep sounds like a beloved Mr. Chips type who ran a high school for many years, then became an administrator at a college beloved by the alumni who named a gold tournament after him. Not really an academic, more of a religious educator. I think to get better sourcing, you'd need Tagalog and English language newspapers to put their archives online. There's enough here for a Keep, and a deletion would only increase Wikipedia's rather glaring bias in favor of subjects in countries that have their newspaper archives online - like US.I.Casaubon (talk) 23:07, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 17:08, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - vice-president of a major university (QS ranking 451) and I think the sources currently cited suggest the existence of more.Anthem 12:41, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note Anthem of joy has been indef blocked as a sockpuppet of Claritas [1]. --Tothwolf (talk) 04:14, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Being a vice president of a major university doesn't make one notable per our current notability guidelines on academics. Moray An Par (talk) 05:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only passing mention news, and only one mention in a book which may fall under WP:SPS. Does not appear to meet the significant coverage requirement of WP:GNG. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of more than routine administrative responsibility, and not notable as author or researcher. DGG ( talk ) 21:47, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.