Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Emerson (priest)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 15:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John Emerson (priest)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:N--can't find reliable, secondary sources providing in-depth coverage of this priest, nor do I see claims that demonstrate inherent notability. The very common name is an obstacle to finding sources, so, as always, additional sources are welcome. joe decker ^{talk to me} 18:55, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I don't see any notability outside of the incident with which he was involved. Perhaps a merger to Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter is in order. Bearian (talk) 20:57, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If someone can't come up with a single reference for this URBLP, merging is the least drastic outcome appropriate. Jclemens (talk) 00:43, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to a lack of notability and reliable sources. I see a few google hits, but all they tell me is that he belongs to the FSSP and is based is Edinburgh. St Anselm (talk) 06:26, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I thought he might be notable as one of the founding priests of the PFSP, but I could find no verification of that claim so I think a redirect is not appropriate. --MelanieN (talk) 15:10, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.