Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Wong (comedian)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Joe Wong (comedian) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find too much coverage on this comedian--and I very much doubt that an appearance on the Late Show is of and in itself enough to merit an article. Blueboy96 04:03, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The Boston Globe discusses his work here: [1] and This google news search turns up plenty of reviews and interviews in many reliable sources, there seems to be plenty here. Some are behind paywalls, but I see enough in the abstracts to indicate that there are many articles that discuss him and his work. --Jayron32 04:31, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I don't find him very funny but [2] and [3], along with many other news results in conjunction with his appearances on Ellen and the Late Show establish him has notable. -- Whpq (talk) 21:26, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Only one comedian is invited to entertain the White House Correspondents Dinner each year. The fact that Wong was makes him notable. Also, besides his appearance on Letterman, he's a regular on The Ellen DeGeneres Show. MyPOV (talk) 21:16, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Agreed with MyPOV, hosting the Correspondents' Dinner makes him notable. WLGades (talk) 09:15, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.