Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy 'Five Bellies' Gardner
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:29, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Jimmy 'Five Bellies' Gardner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Simply does not meet the criteria for an encyclopedia entry. Only thing he's ever done is be mates with Paul Gascoigne, and we all know that notability isn't inherited. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 22:11, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- A more useful set of searches than those linked above: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Phil Bridger (talk) 22:37, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Gazza. Its as nom says. Szzuk (talk) 19:32, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as having no claim to WP notability. The position is summed up in this 'why are they famous' article in The Independent, a reliable source. --AJHingston (talk) 08:28, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Would be amusing if someone tried to use the article as establishing notability! But he is just a hanger on as the article notes. Szzuk (talk) 08:38, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Add: Both redirect or delete are ok with me. Szzuk (talk) 08:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Would be amusing if someone tried to use the article as establishing notability! But he is just a hanger on as the article notes. Szzuk (talk) 08:38, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability is not inherited. Lugnuts (talk) 17:51, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Redirect or Delete. Notability is not Inherited, but redirects don't hurt anyone. --Djohns21 (talk) 20:32, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable limpet. Mjroots (talk) 14:34, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.