Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jieming Unit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DElete Spartaz ^Humbug! 12:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jieming Unit

Potential WP:HOAX. Googling for "Jieming Unit" yields no hits. Potential attack page on someone named Jieming? Either way, the page fails WP:RS and WP:N. Bundling another related page that was created by the same editor. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 06:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also nominating the following related pages:

Delete per nom, also noting that the "inventive" units used would not include kilojoules squared for a quantity in the order of 1E76 - you could drop the kilo and change the order to 82. Strong hoax likelihood; I wouldn't waste much time over this one. BigBlueFish (talk) 17:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both as hoax. No source, can't find any outside reference, originator's sole contributions, reads like a hoax. Can any German speaker tell us if the originator's username "Kuhvorreiber" offers a clue? It should mean something like "cow-before-rubber". JohnCD (talk) 21:12, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Save It is true that at first sight it seems to be a hoax, but that was due to unfortunate timing in the creation of the original page and my updated version. As much as I hate to make excuses for the previous page, the original pages were written by my brother after looking through my notes before I had a chance to sit down and type up as much as I could. I the community understands. If this breaches some sort of verifiable aspect of Wikipedia, I'm very sorry and would be willing to delete the page until the first release of the NMSR. I'm sorry for any inconvenience.

SayHeyKid999 (talk) 05:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment sorry, SayHeyKid999, now that you have expanded the article it looks even more like a hoax. For the "verifiable aspect of Wikipedia", read Verifiability; you will see that everything requires confirmation, and "surprising or apparently important claims that are not widely known" require exceptional confirmation. Bring it back if and when there is somthing peer-reviewed and published. I shall not hold my breath. JohnCD (talk) 22:43, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Obvious WP:HOAX. Mh29255 (talk) 22:28, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Jieming Field per merge and redirect that page to Jieming Unit. Regarding Jieming Unit, however, I was also unable to find any references on Google. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 06:58, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.