Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenna Marie Bourgeois

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jenna Marie Bourgeois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced WP:AUTOBIO of a person notable primarily as a non-winning candidate in a future election, and as a member of the board of directors of a non-notable local musicians' organization. Neither of these are notability claims that get a person into Wikipedia, however -- unless you can demonstrate that they already qualified for a Wikipedia article for some other reason independent of the election campaign itself a candidate has to win the election, not just run in it, to get a Wikipedia article on that basis, and serving on an organizational board of directors is not an automatic notability freebie either. But two of the four sources present here are primary sources, and the two that represent actual media coverage are purely routine coverage of the type that any candidate for office, and any local musician, could always show. There would have to be a lot more media coverage than this for her to get past WP:GNG, and even if and when she does pass GNG she still won't get to write the article herself. Bearcat (talk) 20:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:35, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:35, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:37, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:37, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.