Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayathi De Silva

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Universe Sri Lanka#Titleholders. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:54, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jayathi De Silva

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP: GNG, has only won a national beauty pageant (see WP:1EVENT), failed to place at international level. No other significant achievement since. Fails WP:NMODEL. Dan arndt (talk) 10:18, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 10:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 10:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 10:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 10:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 10:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Miss Universe Sri Lanka#Titleholders ~~Delete~~ -- agree per proposer, although I am willing to consider arguments that there are enough independent sources to justify her inclusion in Wikipedia. Most of the others in this pageant do not have articles, so it suggests to me her position is not sufficient to have an article. I gave a similar vote on another AfD of a contestant from same country, and sent another to AfD. Probably either all of these should stay, or all should go (unless some are more notable for other reasons). --David Tornheim (talk) 08:32, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[revised 09:06, 19 April 2019 (UTC)][reply]
Delete a non-notable beauty queen.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:15, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
redirect Already listed among Miss Universe contestants, but don't see notability for her own article.Sandals1 (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.