Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Adonis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:12, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Adonis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queried AfD Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:14, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Fails WP:PORNBIO. What's your reason for declining the speedy and nominating for AfD? --Pontificalibus (talk) 10:45, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: He's a fairly common name, and I noticed it was deleted so I wanted to see the contents to see if it asserted notability. AA appears to have put it to AfD so that question can be hammered out again. I took a look to see if I could find references, and I did find 2(?) publications via Google, and I imagined I can find others. I'll be busy over the next day or so, so I'd appreciate not closing it in favour of delete due to lack of sources until I've had a chance to search for some myself. Thanks! - BalthCat (talk) 15:08, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - Thanks for reopening this for consideration. Unfortunately I did not find what I thought I'd find. Apparently he's prominent but still not notable. No AVN/GayVNs (though at least one nom.) There are two Google book results, but I can't access them to see whether reference to him within is notable, and that's really all that's left of my keep, so I realise it's not v. strong a case :) - BalthCat (talk) 04:39, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand - I don't think it fails WP:PORNBIO.- --_{Boeing7107isdelicious|SPRiCh miT meineN PiloteN} 04:25, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Clearly fails WP:PORNBIO, no indication that the subject passes the GNG or any other specialized guideline. Only GNews hit is a passing claim that his Wikipedia bio is inaccurate. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not pass WP:PORNBIO. Warrah (talk) 04:59, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO or WP:GNG. Epbr123 (talk) 23:11, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:PORNBIO and the general notability guideline. Per the above reasons, really, Lord Spongefrog, (Talk to me, or I'll eat your liver!) 22:23, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.