Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasmine Simpkins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:39, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jasmine Simpkins

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a web journalist, not referenced to any reliable source coverage about her in media. Of the three references here, one is the IMDb page of a film she was involved in, one is a directory of her writing on the website she works for, and one is her own demo reel on YouTube -- which means none of them are acceptable sources for a Wikipedia article at all. As always, every person who exists is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article -- she needs to be the subject (not the author) of media coverage in sources other than her own paycheque provider to qualify for one. Bearcat (talk) 19:25, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:38, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:39, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:39, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Za wl 08:17, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:56, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails GNG not enough RS. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:59, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.