Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janaa padaalu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 18:00, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Janaa padaalu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a poetry book, not properly sourced as passing our notability criteria for books. As always, books get their own Wikipedia articles only if they have some claim to significance, such as noteworthy literary awards and/or the reception of coverage about the book (e.g. several reviews by professional literary critics in real media). But the only notability claim being made here is that the book exists, and the referencing isn't cutting it at all: three of the four footnotes are mere directory entries on online bookstores, and the other one didn't actually lead to a piece of media coverage about the book, but instead redirected me to an online roulette site. And even if that last one was actually a real WP:GNG-worthy reliable source that's just been temporarily hijacked by an advertiser, it still takes more than just one acceptable source to establish a book's notability anyway.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt this book from having to pass GNG on its sourceability. Bearcat (talk) 16:50, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Poetry and India. Bearcat (talk) 16:50, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

The article is now sourced correctly and the previous link is now corrected. I've also added additional references. Please keep the article. TejaTanikella (talk) 18:51, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:23, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per as nom. I am unable to find review in a google search. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 03:49, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The references of the above book are already added to this. Keep the article. MrTeja (talk • contribs)
Keep: I have checked the links provided, and they are also in the regional language telugu. They are valid according to me.This article must be kept on wikipedia.Tanikellad 07:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC) (Double vote by sock. MarioGom (talk) 23:21, 20 February 2023 (UTC))[reply]
Delete per nom. MarioGom (talk) 18:58, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom lacks indepth coverage.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question: @User:Bearcat and @User:MarioGom Why not we speedy delete this article as the creator is sockpuppeteer and 3 out of 9 edits has made by other users? 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 16:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.