Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Webb III

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A clear consensus to delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

James Webb III

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable basketball player per WP:NCOLLATH. Article was WP:A7 speedy deleted, now re-created. Drm310 (talk) 18:31, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 20:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nominator rationale. Quis separabit? 19:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

He is a future pro basketball player. He deserves to have an article. RC 23:11, 15 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobbCilek (talk • contribs) — Note to closing admin: RobbCilek (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD.

@RobbCilek: Wikipedia articles are about topics that are already notable, not topics that might become notable. --Drm310 (talk) 18:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:55, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If he is a future pro basketball player, he can be the subject of a future Wikipedia article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:37, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not meet WP:NCOLLATH or WP:GNG. Can be recreated if he meets WP:NHOOPS, but will require great improvement over what is already there. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 00:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as still questionable for the applicable notability as shown. SwisterTwister talk 06:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.