Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jalapa Devi Primary School,Terathum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 01:33, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jalapa Devi Primary School,Terathum

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable primary school which has previously been PRODded and was de-PRODded by article creator. PamD 07:49, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ishibu per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES : Noyster (talk), 08:45, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. -- Ascii002 (talk · contribs · guestbook) 10:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- Ascii002 (talk · contribs · guestbook) 10:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect. I was the one who put PROD on it. There is nothing here to demonstrate that it qualifies for an article of its own. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:11, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per longstanding consensus at AfD that ordinary primary schools are presumed non-notable. Carrite (talk) 16:46, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment against redirection: a problem with redirection is that none of the location articles has a section on education, let alone any list of schools etc, and it doesn't seem appropriate to add this totally unsourced content to any of those articles just to justify making the redirect. I suggest actual deletion, with the proviso that there is no objection to creating a redirect to an article (probably Batase, Terhathum, which appears to be the smallest geographical unit it is in, within Ishibu within Terhathum District), once there is some sourced content there to verify the school's existence. None of the three links in the article are coming up with anything for me at present - all seem to be dead links, and I can't find anything else non-Wikipedia-based on Google. PamD 18:58, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per PamD's rationale, with no prejudice against working a mention into an article and creating a redirect if anyone ever figures out exactly where this school is (and can source its existence). Deor (talk) 13:57, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.