Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqui Jackson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 14:30, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jacqui Jackson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are self-published book, documentary which I couldn't find much info about, and an old BBC article. Her son Luke may barely meet notability guidelines but she doesnt Jerry (talk) 02:22, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 03:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This isn't a slam-dunk keep, but there's a fair bit of source material out there if you look hard enough. There's a full profile in The Guardian [1], a profile in the BBC [2], a non-trivial amoung of stuff in the Evening Standard [3], a scholarly review of her book [4], a fair amount of material in a book by an independent author [5], a BBC2 documentary about the family (see previous book source), a film based on said BBC documentary starring Helena Bonham Carter (see previous book source), some commentary on the documentary [6], and at least some mentions in another book which I can't access [7]. Now it's possible this article should be about the family, rather than the mother; but she is the focus of a lot of the stuff, and there's certainly enough to clear GNG. Vanamonde (Talk) 00:31, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Vanamonde93's post above. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:06, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Vanamonde93.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:07, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.