Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacques Hirrle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 19:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jacques Hirrle

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any evidence that he meets WP:BIO. Listed in databases, but no sources which are actually about him. Fram (talk) 14:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 14:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 14:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:32, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep The subject can be considered notable per WP:NSOCCER however there's hardy any coverage. I'm leaning towards keep as there's many association football articles that have even less sources but are kept per WP:NSOCCER.Less Unless (talk) 16:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't believe that policy applies to referees Spiderone 17:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 17:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 18:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For referees their officiated international match (matches) is notability item for them even though friendly match. Sol i think this article has no ane reason for delete.... Almgerdeu (talk) 01:47, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - referees need to pass WP:GNG so there needs to be clear and significant coverage from reliable secondary sources. There is no inherent notability for referees just because they have refereed an international friendly fixture. Spiderone 10:29, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. I would argue for WP:BIO if he had refereed many important matches, but he didn't. Walwal20 ^{talk ▾ contribs} 16:44, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is your important match?? for players to play in official match (even friendly) is enough for notability. Jacques Hirrle officiated 4 official friendly matches. Is not enough? Or why is enough for football player (s) but not for referee??? Walwal20 ^{talk ▾ contribs} Spiderone Almgerdeu (talk) 18:17, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not about how many matches he has refereed. It's about whether he is the subject of significant coverage from reliable secondary sources Spiderone 21:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Don't mean to throw a spanner in the works but surely there will be newspaper articles, offline sources. This AfD seems bias towards the online review. Govvy (talk) 00:00, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

so i removed PROD...thanks all of you. Almgerdeu (talk) 08:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

it's generally considered best practice not to remove an AfD until the discussion has concluded Spiderone 09:49, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are many, a lot, more more articles as we talked...this article have sources and created and edited correctly (i had mistakes that some users informed me, before)....so i corrected all of them....i did not understand that why this article must delete......Almgerdeu (talk) 15:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All the sources provided are just routine entries in database websites. There isn't any evidence that Hirrle has received significant coverage. If such sources can be found, please do link them in the article and I am happy to change my vote. Spiderone 16:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is no showing of actual significant coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:59, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.