Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Toft-Andersen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:38, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Toft-Andersen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable professional gamer. Ridernyc (talk) 05:15, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lack of reliable, third party sources. Notability not established. Sergecross73 msg me 13:27, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

COMMENT : As he also participated in the Dota 2 The International (with MeetYourMakers) and placed 4th, this could be based on the arguments going on here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Antonov (Professional Gamer). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redefining history (talk • contribs) 00:48, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note These debates are being discussed off wiki here [1] I now know why so SPA's have been active on these pages. Ridernyc (talk) 01:23, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We really need third party sources on these guys. There are reputable gaming publications out there. If they haven't been covered in those, then the notability isn't there. The Interior (Talk) 08:50, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence they meet the GNG or are notable. -DJSasso (talk) 18:44, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Lack of signifcant coverage by reliable third party sources. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:13, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The subject fails the GNG. Are there any reliable sources any proponent wishes to cite, not counting gaming blogs? It is well-established policy that it is not enough to claim that surely there must be reliable sources out there, somewhere, maybe, possibly, hopefully. Such sources must be produced. They have not been. Ravenswing 13:29, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.