Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isabella Gerasole

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:12, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Isabella Gerasole

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources included in the article. Andise1 (talk) 05:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete winning some "best webcast" award does not make one notable, especially when the only source for that is the website of the granting organization.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:31, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unsourced BLP with article having no real claim to notability. Agricola44 (talk) 21:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - Although there are some sources that discuss the subject, there just aren't enough that go in depth. This means that the subject does not fulfill our standard of verifiability. Thus, it should be deleted. RileyBugz ^会話 _投稿記録 02:24, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.