Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Into the Woods (Warriors)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Warriors (novel series). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Into the Woods (Warriors)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

split to new line --slakr^\ talk / 01:45, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What has this AfD to do with The United States of America? User:Gene93k, can you please explain? -- Mikeblas (talk) 01:00, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The publisher, Tokyopop, is American. I sorted under country of origin. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Warriors (novel series). This will allow the history to remain intact so I have the time to merge their contents in. Bramble claw x 13:26, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, slakr^\ talk / 01:45, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 07:54, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per above. I tried to find sourcing, but couldn't really find anything. The only true RS I found was a SLJ blog post and this one source isn't enough to show notability. (On a side note, the SLJ does post a few blogs, but they are fairly discerning about who and what they allow on their website and this is one of only 10 blogs they post on their website. The blog is edited and verified by SLJ editors and is one of the rare exceptions to the blog rule.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:04, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tokyogirl79 Thank you so much for that note, I think it will come in handy for most of my work on Warriors articles. Bramble claw x 13:52, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No problem- I've used them before and gotten some "but they're a blog" comments, but they're edited and looked over to the point that they're not really blogs as much as they're articles for the SLJ. Some of the writers may post them on other sites, but they're written for the SLJ first and foremost. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.