Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Islamic and Secular Studies (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 04:51, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Institute of Islamic and Secular Studies

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Institute of Islamic and Secular Studies
• Articles for deletion/Institute of Islamic and Secular Studies (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Institute of Islamic and Secular Studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been unreferenced since 2014, I was unable to find multiple in-depth reliable sources about the school in a WP:BEFORE and secondary schools are not inherently notable per consensus in the RfC about it. There was an AfD for the school back in 2014, but no one was able to find sources for it and everyone who keep cited SCOOLOUTCOMES and the inherent notability of secondary schools. Which again isn't valid anymore. So there has been no guideline based discussion about it so far. I'd like there to be one this time based on WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Instead of people who vote keep just citing a no longer valid standard or an irrelevant essay. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:29, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:41, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:41, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mauritius-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:41, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

• Delete: Does not meet GNG or NORG, BEFORE showed nothing and article lacks RS with SIGCOV that addresses the subject directly and in-depth.   // Timothy :: talk  17:24, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.