Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inertia tensor of triangle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:27, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inertia tensor of triangle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One textbook's derivation does not an article make per WP:GNG. Use of "covariance" for second spatial moment is nonstandard and confusing. Jasper Deng (talk) 07:50, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete as not a suitable topic for an article. Or what next, an article for the inertia tensor of every geometrical shape? An article for the area/volume of each? The result could be added to List of moments of inertia, but the rest of the content does not belong anywhere.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 08:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:26, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of moments of inertia. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:42, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for reasons described by JohnBlackburne. --Steve (talk) 14:09, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE, as the nominator points out. Smmurphy^(Talk) 14:32, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 21:45, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.