Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imagine Homes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Imagine Homes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A directory-like listing for an non notable private business. Significant RS coverage not found. The article lists no sources, apart from a link to the corporate web site. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by Special:Contributions/Jonbowman with no other contributions outside this topic. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:49, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep See page history for improvements, has been mostly cleared of promotional material, notable topic. Nominator previously tried to CSD and PROD this article. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 23:00, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A simple assertion that the topic is "notable" is insufficient in AfD discussions. Are there sources that discuss the topic directly and in detail? --K.e.coffman (talk) 23:07, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

True. I've added sources. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 05:36, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These sources, as shown in this diff, clearly do not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. They are directory listings, interviews, and non-independent sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:25, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:57, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:59, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Classic WP:CORPSPAM. --Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 07:00, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A company that was the victim of the property crash and disappeared in 2009. Even if it was well referenced which it isn't i don't see any encyclopedic value in this article. Szzuk (talk) 13:29, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:06, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the same reasons as above. As a side-note, it's very weird that an article about a UK subject is written in blatantly American English; makes it seem even more spammy that it already is. Waggers TALK 12:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with above, fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:13, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.