Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hungary–Tajikistan relations
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:58, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hungary–Tajikistan relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
another random combination with no evidence of notable relationship. LibStar (talk) 02:44, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as noncontroversial. --Mr Accountable (talk) 02:49, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- that's hardly a reason Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions.LibStar (talk) 03:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- And four "delete" statements surely mean that it's somewhat controversial...
- Every single comment for delete except you means its totally uncontroversial. LibStar (talk) 05:04, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- And four "delete" statements surely mean that it's somewhat controversial...
- Delete Non-notable, no sources are given and the only link is to a page about Kyrgyzstan's relations with Hungary, not Tajikistan's. I can't find anything relevant that would necessitate yet another of these random pairings.DSZ (talk) 03:14, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Can't find anything significant. This could certainly be covered in Foreign relations of Tajikistan, but there's not enough material for its own page. Graymornings(talk) 03:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. There is less than nothing to say about relations between this pair of countries. Stifle (talk) 09:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Surely the presence of an accredited Tajik ambassador in Austria is something to say :-) but it's not enough for notability. Nyttend (talk) 12:01, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - random pairing, no sources to indicate notability to the relationship. - Biruitorul Talk 18:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete--I didn't see any notability either. Drmies (talk) 05:00, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This article is a very pretty way of saying nothing. Non-notable. --BlueSquadronRaven 16:28, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this notability of this subject is bellow zero. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:32, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, request this AfD be suspended until consensus is achieved at Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Bilateral international relations. Martintg (talk) 04:14, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - There are sources per this search, however most is a onetime ordeal between some foreign minister and Hungary. -Marcusmax(speak) 13:53, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.