Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humphrey's Restaurant & Tavern
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. There is consensus on keeping. Keepers provided evidence that GNG is met (and NTEMP), while the only delete voter (excluding nom, who nominated it before sources were provided by two other users) did not give any explanations. (non-admin closure) Timothytyy (talk) 04:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Humphrey's Restaurant & Tavern (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage to meet GNG. 1 source is IMDB which merely confirms some trivia, another being a Wikipedia page as per WP:CIRCULAR. LibStar (talk) 06:19, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Business, and Missouri. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:15, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: I've aAdded references from local news sources. Seems to have significant coverage/cultural importance to local area. Jack4576 (talk) 08:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Entities need more than local sources to establish notability as per WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 00:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- That's a special guideline that does not apply to WP:GNG. -- GreenC 19:19, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Entities need more than local sources to establish notability as per WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 00:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: I've aAdded references from local news sources. Seems to have significant coverage/cultural importance to local area. Jack4576 (talk) 08:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- •Delete - Non-Notable PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 21:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Lightburst (talk) 13:54, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep WP:GNG multiple reliable sources. More from St. Louis Today: [1]. -- GreenC 19:32, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep WP:GNG is met and WP:NTEMP Lightburst (talk) 22:56, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.