Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hizbollywood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 05:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hizbollywood

Neologism, material covered elsewhere. Nothing to merge, not worthy of a redirect - crz crztalk 20:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletions. - crz crztalk 20:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomOo7565 20:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, neologism/POV fork. Demiurge 20:37, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn neologism and the material is covered elsewhere. --70.51.229.211 20:40, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletions. --70.51.229.211 20:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone else. Wow, that title sounds like somebody trying to imitate gangster speak to be cool. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 23:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete POV WP:SOAPBOX, neologism violation. Bwithh 01:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with WP:POV problems & as a neologism. SkierRMH 02:34, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nom. —dima/s-ko/ 04:16, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete POV content forking, Tewfik^Talk 06:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- Szvest - ^{Wiki me up ®} 19:45, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Love it! Anyways, its defntly not WP:SOAP, it was all over the media. Find a better WP:rule. frummer 21:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict photographs controversies ...

AnonMoos 12:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it it is a refferance to the general abuse of the media by lebanese terrorists [not just the last israel-lebanon conflict].. which used to be described as Pallywood [being perpetrated mostly by palestinians] but now the term Hizbollywood has picked up in notability. i don't know about you, but i've seen it on plenty occassions. Jaakobou 15:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The term is widely used - but just in blogs. I looked up in a search engine, and found that the term is used primarily by bloggers, and other media refers to blogs when mentioning it. Thus, it is not a verifiable term, according to Wikipedia rules (as opposed to Pallywood which caught up with mainstream media during the Intifada years). Move the relevant material to 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict photographs controversies and then redirect. --Gabi S. 18:29, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.