Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Higher Education Commission
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus was this is a useful disambiguation. (non-admin closure) Rollidan (talk) 21:18, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Higher Education Commission (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Glorified disambiguation page with no references and no useful content Rathfelder (talk) 19:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 19:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 04:37, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: now a straightforward useful and necessary dab page. Some entries may be a bit questionable, but the Bangladesh, India and Pakistan entries show it to be necessary. PamD 11:04, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. I see no reason at all for the deletion of the this disambiguation page. It is both useful and necessary, and is in line with WP:DISAMBIG. The nominator mentioned that the page has "no references and no useful content." This is exactly how it is supposed to be per WP:DISAMBIG, as it only a list of items with the same name and disambiguation pages are not supposed to have references. MarkZusab (talk) 16:47, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- But at the time it was nominated it wasn't formatted as a dab page and did have an unsourced para of content. PamD 11:25, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep after helpful edits. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:33, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:56, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep as a great example of a disambiguation page. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:04, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Happy to withdraw this nomination. Rathfelder (talk) 11:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.