Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harriadnie Beau

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Harriadnie Beau

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"not notable & self written article"[1] --- Completing a malformed AfD nomination for Bobbymills7777 (talk · contribs) --- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:08, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Brand ambassador isn't a real thing. Lacks notoriety. No proper citations. Appears to be self-written. WP:BIO. sig1068 — Preceding undated comment added 00:50, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep agree article in past shape was substandard, but references are there in the mishmash of the fashion world (took some digging), with numerous articles talking about her in depth to meet the substantial coverage requirement, independent sources, meets GNG and model.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 18:05, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:14, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 03:44, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - It should be compulsory to add pictures to fashion model articles. It helps (me) to make up my mind about their notability. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 22:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.