Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanuman Sahai Jat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:09, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hanuman Sahai Jat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Article apparently created by a relative. Sitush (talk) 12:59, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hanuman Sahai Jat is notable person in Phagi tehsil (Sub district of Jaipur district), Rajasthan. He is well-known person in his area Jaipur. -Ashok Todawata (talk) 13:31, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:GNG and note what is explained at WP:LOCALFAME. You need to find decent coverage in independnet, reliable sources to support your claim. And you should not be editing the article anyway, per WP:COI. - Sitush (talk) 13:38, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:02, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:02, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. MT Train^Talk 16:06, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete--A7 exists for these cases:)~ Winged Blades^Godric 16:23, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Even when it has been de-PRODed? I know this is a waste of everyone's time but it isn't my doing, I'm afraid. - Sitush (talk) 16:26, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Deprodding doesn't affect applicability/execution of of any CSD-criterion.But, I will be happy enough to let the AFD run and thus consequently equip us with G4, in case the need arises:)~ Winged Blades^Godric 17:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ah, I thought if someone removed a CSD A7 or PROD then it had to go to AfD. Admittedly, I could have done A7 first, rather than PROD, but I thought it might give them a few days to prove notability. They'll now have a few days through this process, although it is a no-hoper. - Sitush (talk) 17:33, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete for obvious reasons as above. Ajf773 (talk) 17:48, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete While it is against directives to put a second PROD on an article (I have seen it done successfully however), that does not mean that when the actually debate opens we have to wait a whole 7 days to delete such an obvious case.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:59, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - You can't challenge the notability of this person in his area Jaipur, a famous city of India. -Ashok Todawata (talk) 08:21, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as a biography about a real person that does not assert notability. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:28, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - no third party reliable sources for notability.. looks like self created article --Adamstraw99 (talk) 13:40, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.