Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanna Tucker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 06:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hanna Tucker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which evidence the notability of this model under WP:GNG. I found a couple YouTube videos of the alleged web series after having failed to see the title appear in a plain Google search, I see that one episode reached 32 views. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I wish her well, but it's just far too soon for her to have an article. None of her modeling gigs have landed her any coverage to speak of, which is ultimately what we need to show notability. She hasn't received any coverage for acting either. Basically what we need here are news articles (or the equivalent) that talk about her in-depth. Just being a model, actress, and making a webseries isn't enough for notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability. No sources but self pub first party website. - - MrBill3 (talk) 07:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lack of secondary source coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:10, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Google news search for her name in quotes reveals her Facebook profile. No secondary sources to be found anywhere. YouTube videos establish no notability with <50 views. Elassint ^Hi 09:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.